

Amazing that prejudice against D&D still exists. The only study I ever heard of done on D&D players showed that they were wayyyyyy less likely to do anything that parents and authorities disapprove of. Dumb prison folks think that it's bad to have prisoners using their imagination.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
--------------------------------------
The question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be... The nation and the world are in dire need of creative extremists.
-------------------------------------
We may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now.
--------------------------------------
We must develop and maintain the capacity to forgive. He who is devoid of the power to forgive is devoid of the power to love. There is some good in the worst of us and some evil in the best of us. When we discover this, we are less prone to hate our enemies.
--------------------------------------
We who in engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive.
--------------------------------------
Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. I can never be what I ought to be until you are what you ought to be. This is the interrelated structure of reality.
--------------------------------------
When you are right you cannot be too radical; when you are wrong, you cannot be too conservative.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Many people are highly prejudiced against anything that might be against the law. As someone who advocates for civil disobedience, I encounter this prejudice regularly. I think MLK had similar thoughts when he said, "Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal."
(These days I'm nauseated by the overuse of Hitler references, but the point doesn't require Hitler at all, as there are many terrible examples of this concept.)
How do we help get the culture beyond a blind prejudice for the law, regardless of how horrible the laws might be? We could really use some more social progress, since we have mostly global problems these days.
There are 100 members of the Senate. But because of the filibuster rule, it takes only 41 to stop any bill from passing.
U.S. population: 307,006,550.
Population for the 20 least-populated states: 31,434,822.
That means that in the Senate, all it takes to stop legislation is one guy plus 40 senators representing 10.2 percent of the country.
(excerpted from Gail Collins' op-ed piece)
Hahahahahahaha! Such great smiles on those mugshots!
http://pzrservices.typepad.com/advertisi
Article here:A 2008 report from Oil Change International that estimated the carbon footprint of the Iraq war found it responsible for “at least 141 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.” Ranked as a country, “it would emit more CO2 each year than 139 of the world’s nations do annually.”
http://www.environmentalnewsstand.com/in
Had a few days in a hotel in downtown Minneapolis. I love hotels, and we had fun walking/exploring the huge skyway network. A couple of minutes outside and it was clear why they built it. It was only 20 degrees, which was a good 40 degrees warmer than it could have been, but one gust of that biting wind and it felt below zero. I was in awe of the bicyclers, bicycling through that weather rolling over snow-dusted ice.
Had excellent food at Brasa's in St. Paul.
Saw a few close friends socially, but was unable to see many others. (
http://www.starbulletin.com/editori
In most areas of Vermont right now, you can drive to a community health center near you where you’ll get excellent quality primary health care. If you have no health insurance, you’re charged on a sliding scale basis. If you have Medicare or Medicaid, they’re delighted to have you. And private health insurance, that’s great, too. We’ve gone from two community health centers in Vermont to eight. And those eight centers have 41 separate locations and are used by about 100,000 people – and that’s in a population a bit over 600,000. So we know they work.
As of this point, we have added $10 billion for the program in the Senate bill. Congressman Jim Clyburn has added $14 billion in the House bill. And my hope is the conference committee will go with the $14 billion. What we would do with $14 billion is expand access from the current 20 million people served by community health centers to 45 million people. It will mean establishing CHCs and their satellites in 10,000 new communities. What it also means is that we will dramatically increase funding for the National Health Service Corps so we have an additional 20,000 doctors, dentists and nurses. It’s a revolution in primary health care if we get what I hope we get....
When we talk about health care, people tend to talk about insurance. But equally important is access. You need to be able to find a primary-care physician and a dentist and a mental-health counselor. The $14 billion will have a profound impact on addressing the crisis in primary care in this country. We’re not graduating enough primary-care doctors, and even people with insurance often can’t find one. But the insanity is that we’re not just depriving people of primary care they need, but we’re sending them to the emergency room. And the emergency room will treat you for the common cold and charge $600 to $1,000, and the community health center will cost $100. If we spend on community health centers, you actually save money.
We also have a major problem with dental care in this country. But community health centers provide that, and so, too, with mental-health counseling. They also provide some of the lowest-cost prescription drugs in America. This program, ironically enough, has widespread bipartisan support. Even George W. Bush put money into this program. John McCain campaigned on it. In the stimulus package, we doubled funding to about $2 billion a year and brought it up to $4 billion.
Compared to what these bills could have been or should have been, they are definitely disappointing. Compared to what the government has done in the past on health care, however, I do think it represents an improvement and a significant step forward. Here's one editorial on the topic that I think is convincing: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co
Certainly I would love to see HCR improved in a number of areas, but I think the consequences of it not passing this session would effectively close the window on reform efforts, lead to Republican resurgence, and make any HCR in the future worse/less likely. Passing even a flawed bill would show that the Dems can actually do something and provide momentum to improving HCR down the line as well as tackling other important progressive reforms.
Al Franken agrees with me. :P
It is much better. Details here:
http://www.fcnl.org/issues/item.php?ite
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20091130/r
Short summary: The US military hires "contractors" to work "security" on many supply routes in Afghanistan. These contractors bribe the Taliban not to attack them. The US military knows this happens.
